|
Post by josef on Oct 25, 2016 15:12:01 GMT
I was wondering if we could have some love for this song? It has always been a huge favourite from the first listen and it still gives me goosebumps, even more than Dancing Queen. It should be prescribed for depression. It's like aural sunshine or pure MDMA or something! It's irresistible, one of those songs which immediately after the first play I am already craving another listen. I don't know how they did that guitar sound (I'm not technically minded at all) but I know something good when I hear it. There's a 'heavenly' quality to this song, it truly reaches something 'other worldly'. Or maybe it's just a good song and I'm waxing too lyrical! Anyway, who else is powerless to resist its charms?
|
|
|
Post by foreverfan on Oct 25, 2016 16:17:27 GMT
It should've been a single in its own right... but when, 1976 had 4 singles, a rarity for Abba, 3 number ones and a number 3 here in the U.K. Albeit all not from the same album, could we have had 5 singles in 1976? There was a gap between Fernando, ( early June departure and DQ in early September) So alas WIKTT, missed the boat, great little video, very catch track, destined to always be a album track, shame. always wondered why it was passed over...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2016 16:22:06 GMT
Fun song - excellent album opener. But for me it's basically the antipasti before the more sumptuous fare dished up later on as 'Arrival' unfolds. Actually, to resort to a wild generalisation, I tend to prefer albums that don't lead off with the best track, as they take you on more of a journey. By that criterion, WIKTT is pretty much the perfect lead-off track. KMKY is the Everest in this particular mountain range and WIKTT helps you start to acclimatise. Does ANY of that make sense? ?
|
|
|
Post by The Rubber Ball Man on Oct 25, 2016 16:34:29 GMT
I'd like to kiss one of the fit teachers at school!!! but then it's illegal
|
|
|
Post by Alan on Oct 25, 2016 19:31:38 GMT
Fun song - excellent album opener. But for me it's basically the antipasti before the more sumptuous fare dished up later on as 'Arrival' unfolds. Actually, to resort to a wild generalisation, I tend to prefer albums that don't lead off with the best track, as they take you on more of a journey. By that criterion, WIKTT is pretty much the perfect lead-off track. KMKY is the Everest in this particular mountain range and WIKTT helps you start to acclimatise. Does ANY of that make sense? ? Yes, I'd agree with that. To me it screams "opening album track" louder than others apart from, perhaps, As Good As New.
|
|
|
Post by josef on Oct 25, 2016 20:02:07 GMT
It does make sense and of course I get the KMKY reference. And that's naturally a mammoth song, one of ABBA's finest moments.
But this isn't really my point. I think it's quite unfair to put WIKTT in the 'just an opening track' bracket. To me, it's much more than that. It's a classic pop song, it has an indefinable 'something'.
Oh well, hopefully someone will come along who shares my passion for the song. I haven't been on here much, there doesn't seem much interaction. Or maybe it's just me. Yeah, probably the latter.
|
|
|
Post by The Rubber Ball Man on Oct 25, 2016 21:17:35 GMT
I think the song just draws you into the whole album which is one of the many reasons why we love this song.
|
|
|
Post by crackinup on Oct 25, 2016 23:12:54 GMT
I've always felt that WIKTT is like a sunny day overwritten with good ol' Swedish melancholy. There's something in the arrangement, melody and the lyrics that just triggers nostalgia in me, just like memories of the school desk could in many people.
|
|
|
Post by foreverfan on Oct 26, 2016 7:28:00 GMT
Josef.... i have to agree a little, about interaction, I guess it's just a different forum, I wish there was some more ......ooomph , not not sure what's missing if anything, it may just be...... us ! still we carry on....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2016 8:23:18 GMT
It's a classic pop song, it has an indefinable 'something'. On a (slightly) different tack, I kind of like the fact that ABBA did a whole raft of great songs that the public at large basically don't know so aren't regarded as classics by hoi polloi. WIKTT is definitely one of those. I enjoy all those 'shoulda been a single' threads, but overall I'm glad that there are these pretty much hidden gems ('The Visitors' is another obvious example). It's great that people will be rewarded if they put in a bit of effort (i.e. go beyond 'ABBA Gold') and find this treasure trove, which definitely includes WIKTT, as they venture beyond the acknowledged classics.
|
|
|
Post by josef on Oct 26, 2016 14:36:04 GMT
Josef.... i have to agree a little, about interaction, I guess it's just a different forum, I wish there was some more ......ooomph , Yes, Graham. I'll give it a little time but it's disheartening when you start a thread (not this particular one) and it gets very little response or a jokey post that doesn't answer your originally question. It makes you feel like not bothering. Ah, well...probably others feel the same. I like the picture threads (I have no problem with a thread that becomes a 'shrine' to Agnetha, Frida or anyone else- no one is forced to look at them) but I do enjoy debate more, and proper opinions. I like to know the WHY from fans, not just ''I don't like such and such..''.
|
|
|
Post by Alan on Oct 28, 2016 18:56:45 GMT
Josef.... i have to agree a little, about interaction, I guess it's just a different forum, I wish there was some more ......ooomph , not not sure what's missing if anything, it may just be...... us ! still we carry on.... What's clear from these forums is that there are those who are just happy to post photos and those that want more serious discussion. It's almost like two forums in one, as one lot of members rarely interacts with the other. As long as one side doesn't start to overpower the other, it's OK.
|
|
|
Post by Zeebee on Oct 31, 2016 21:00:03 GMT
That generally isn't happening here, but I have started threads on other forums that got very little response.
|
|
|
Post by Zeebee on Oct 31, 2016 21:03:49 GMT
What's clear from these forums is that there are those who are just happy to post photos and those that want more serious discussion. Before Carlo announced his decision to shut down abbaforum, people here were mostly posting photos, so I didn't have much to do as a moderator. It took me only a few minutes to look at everything that had been posted since the last time I logged in. But now there is a lot more discussion, which I like.
|
|
|
Post by wombat on Nov 7, 2016 14:15:55 GMT
Does anybody have a timeline as to which tracks on Arrival were recorded first and which were last etc?
When I Kissed the Teacher has an excellent beginning, if you get a version that isnt terribly compressed, when the whole band kicks in, its like a cannon.
But after that, there are points when the layering and over-dubbing seems to get muddy, its the same thing that plagued the mixes on the album before this.
Other songs on Arrival seem better about this. There probably isnt a very good explanation but if When I kissed the Teacher was mixed first... maybe they finished it and decided, "maybe we should go for a more open sound". Just a guess, I have no idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2016 14:58:23 GMT
Those first few seconds are great. For my taste, the vocals kick in too early. I'd have doubled the number of bars before that happens. Build a bit of expectation and all that. I've always liked that little pop-pop bass figure a few seconds from the end, too. I'm a bit of a mug for that little trick. There's certainly a lot going on in one or two places - but just when you think it might be getting too much, they pull it back a bit. I've always thought that all that busy-ness and hubbub neatly reflects the whirl of the school environment. Maybe I'm over-thinking it!
|
|
|
Post by wombat on Nov 7, 2016 15:48:52 GMT
I dont know if its too much vari-speed trying to get the phil spector thing.... this was the trick they used to great (And awful) effect for the first few albums, really piling it on thick here and there... and then seemed to lighten up on it as time went on.
Or if its a case of so many backing vocals mixed loud and competing with everything else.
They arent Deep Purple. You can't really have "everything louder than everything else".
|
|
|
Post by Zeebee on Nov 7, 2016 17:57:24 GMT
Those first few seconds are great. For my taste, the vocals kick in too early. I'd have doubled the number of bars before that happens. Build a bit of expectation and all that. I'd never thought about that, but I agree. On the other hand, ABBA did even shorter intros, such as I've Been Waiting For You and Slipping Through My Fingers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2016 8:50:58 GMT
Those first few seconds are great. For my taste, the vocals kick in too early. I'd have doubled the number of bars before that happens. Build a bit of expectation and all that. I'd never thought about that, but I agree. On the other hand, ABBA did even shorter intros, such as I've Been Waiting For You and Slipping Through My Fingers. I quite like the 'straight in with the vocals' surprise tactic on STMY. WIKTT is a bit of a halfway house - as I say, ideally, I'd like the intro doubled. Failing that, I'd probably prefer it halved. Just the E-flat (?) chord and then keep it there as the vocal piles in. As it stands, it sounds a little neither-one-thing-nor-the-other. Just my own preference.
|
|
|
Post by Michal on Nov 8, 2016 12:28:14 GMT
Does anybody have a timeline as to which tracks on Arrival were recorded first and which were last etc? This kind of information can be found in C. M. Palm's book The Complete Recording Sessions. However, most people here seem to have negative feelings towards this project for some reason, as I noticed. In my opinion the original book published in 1994 is fantastic and I'm looking forward to the updated version. Unfortunately I have the book at my parents' house at the moment, so I can't look up the timeline of the Arrival tracks for you right now. Maybe later
|
|
|
Post by shoshin on Nov 8, 2016 14:22:03 GMT
I'd never thought about that, but I agree. On the other hand, ABBA did even shorter intros, such as I've Been Waiting For You and Slipping Through My Fingers. ...I'd like the intro doubled. Failing that, I'd probably prefer it halved. Just the E-flat (?) chord... Yes, it's in E-flat, which is interesting in itself, because it's the last key that Bjorn would have chosen for it when he and Benny were developing the song, and it's doubtful that Benny would have deliberately picked E-flat just to make Bjorn sweat on the guitar. If you were strumming away with a pianist, trying things out, you would want to be a semitone lower in D. Indeed, the live segment of it in the Movie is played in D, and (confusingly) whoever is playing the acoustic guitar on the intro to the recorded version is clearly playing the chord shape of D rather than E-flat. So either the guitar is tuned a semitone higher, or a capo is being used on the first fret, or (unlikely) the whole thing was recorded in D then speeded up. Further, choosing E-flat means that the 'one of these days' note is a semitone higher than what I believe to have been Frida's belted ceiling of B4. She may have been able to make it in 1976, but it wouldn't have been comfortable at all. So why choose E-flat? There are several possibilities, but the key point (ha-ha) is that B&B would always have their musical or (more likely) vocal reasons for this kind of a call. Regarding the short intro, it could be argued that it's actually a very long intro, given that the band doesn't kick in till after the first verse. But there's an easy way to check how it would sound if the vocals came in later. Just start singing 'Everybody screamed...' beginning around 11 seconds into When I'm Dead and Gone (which is again in the key of D)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2016 14:48:16 GMT
Excellent - and yes, that confirms my preference for a double-length guitar intro before the vocal arrives. And my money's firmly on the capo. Re-tuning is a massive pain, especially for the harmonically challenged (like myself).
|
|
|
Post by Alan on Nov 8, 2016 20:37:40 GMT
Does anybody have a timeline as to which tracks on Arrival were recorded first and which were last etc? This kind of information can be found in C. M. Palm's book The Complete Recording Sessions. However, most people here seem to have negative feelings towards this project for some reason, as I noticed. In my opinion the original book published in 1994 is fantastic and I'm looking forward to the updated version. Unfortunately I have the book at my parents' house at the moment, so I can't look up the timeline of the Arrival tracks for you right now. Maybe later These days, the info can be found anywhere. Take Wikipedia for example: By the time ABBA began working on their fourth album in August 1975, they had achieved a modest level of success around the world. It was with Arrival however that they would achieve global superstardom to become the biggest name in the music business - a title they would hold for the rest of the decade. The first song to enter the studio was a track called "Boogaloo" on 4 August. Taking inspiration from the current disco sound (and in particular George McCrae's "Rock Your Baby") heavily present in the charts, the backing track was laid down. All four members remember hearing this for the first time and knew that they had something big on their hands, as member Agnetha Faltskog remarked: "We knew immediately it was going to be massive". With re-written lyrics, the song became known as "Dancing Queen", and would go on to be ABBA's biggest ever hit. Work on the song continued intermittently until December as the group's activities were increasing in the latter half of 1975 as they saw a sudden surge in popularity in the United Kingdom and Australia. During this time they also recorded a song for member Annifrid Lyngstad's solo album, "Fernando". Early in the new year, they decided to release it internationally as an ABBA song and with English lyrics the song became the group's next single in March 1976. "Fernando" became ABBA's biggest hit to date - hitting No.1 in many countries, including a 14-week stay at No.1 in Australia. Also around this time their Greatest Hits album was selling in huge amounts, becoming the biggest-selling album of the year in the UK. In the midst of all this promotion, the group finally found time to return to the studio in late March. The next song they began working on was "Knowing Me, Knowing You", which was to become yet another major hit all over the world. Member Benny Andersson has said that it is "one of our five best recordings". By the end of April two other songs had been laid down entitled "That's Me" and "Why Did It Have to Be Me". The latter of these then became reworked into "Happy Hawaii" before ultimately arriving back at its original title with completely different lyrics and member Bjorn Ulvaeus on lead as opposed to Faltskog and Lyngstad ("Happy Hawaii" would later be released as a B-side). A similar situation occurred with the next recording when a song called "Money Money Money" became "Gypsy Girl" and then back to its original title. "Money Money Money" would also be released as a single and become a major hit some months after the album's eventual release. During June, the group were invited by Swedish television to make a TV special dedicated to the group The programme entitled ABBA-dabba-dooo!! was filmed around the same time they were recording a song called "When I Kissed the Teacher", which would become the opening track on their new album. Late July saw the next two tracks "Tiger" and "Dum Dum Diddle" go into the studio. Considered by biographer Carl Magnus Palm as the "complete antithesis" of each other, the former being a hard rocker against the pure pop of the latter, members Lyngstad and Ulvaeus have both expressed dissatisfaction for the latter, with Ulvaeus admitting that it was a nonsense lyric he'd come up with in desperation. The next song to be recorded for the album was a Faltskog lead titled "My Love My Life". Originally titled "Monsieur Monsieur" and more upbeat, the song soon became a lush ballad with backing harmonies inspired by 10cc's hit "I'm Not In Love". It was also around this time "Why Did It Have to Be Me" was completed as well as the album's lead single to be released internationally; "Dancing Queen". The final track to be recorded was an instrumental song, "Ode to Dalecarlia". Featuring Andersson prominently on keyboards, the song was soon renamed "Arrival" - a word that had already been decided on as the title of their new album. By September 1976 work on the album was finished just as "Dancing Queen" was hitting No.1 all over the world. The album cover shots were taken of the group posing in and out of a helicopter (a Bell 47) at the Barkarby airfield, northwest of Stockholm.[1] The now-renowned "mirrored-B" copyrighted ABBA logo, designed by Rune Söderqvist in 1976 — and said to have been inspired by Benny — was also premiered on this album cover. Arrival was released on 11 October 1976.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 7:49:18 GMT
...I'd like the intro doubled. Failing that, I'd probably prefer it halved. Just the E-flat (?) chord... Yes, it's in E-flat, which is interesting in itself, because it's the last key that Bjorn would have chosen for it when he and Benny were developing the song, and it's doubtful that Benny would have deliberately picked E-flat just to make Bjorn sweat on the guitar. If you were strumming away with a pianist, trying things out, you would want to be a semitone lower in D How are the E chords more difficult than the D ones if you're just strumming with the pianist? Concerning the vocal range, D and especially C are safer within the normal male domain, anything above the high E note gets tricky. If they chose that E key from the beginning, it's interesting because they obviously must have had the girls' possibilities in mind from the very start.
|
|
|
Post by shoshin on Nov 9, 2016 11:32:28 GMT
Yes, it's in E-flat, which is interesting in itself, because it's the last key that Bjorn would have chosen for it when he and Benny were developing the song, and it's doubtful that Benny would have deliberately picked E-flat just to make Bjorn sweat on the guitar. If you were strumming away with a pianist, trying things out, you would want to be a semitone lower in D How are the E chords more difficult than the D ones if you're just strumming with the pianist? Concerning the vocal range, D and especially C are safer within the normal male domain, anything above the high E note gets tricky. If they chose that E key from the beginning, it's interesting because they obviously must have had the girls' possibilities in mind from the very start. It's not E though, it's E-flat. I can explain the issues in a sentence if you play guitar, or a page if you don't I would be happy to do the latter, but it might not make particularly interesting reading! I could maybe post a video of it being played in the three keys D, E, and E-flat; seeing the fingering in each case would make the point more effectively than a long written explanation. Very briefly, a guitarist wouldn't normally choose to develop a song in the key of E-flat because the E-flat major triad makes the basic E-flat chord shape awkward; not difficult so much as restricting. Almost all of the other chords used in WIKTT are similarly compromised when the key is E-flat rather than D. I agree that B & B always had the girls' capabilities in mind in terms of relative range and harmony intervals, but they wouldn't need to worry about the final key when developing the song together. If you listen to FATSTAPA, the melody and chords are already complete, yet four or five different keys are attempted before settling on a Frida-only version in a lower key than her first try. This is exactly why I take such an interest in the key that eventually appears on the recorded version of any ABBA song. There will always have been a logic behind this choice, probably connected with the vocal options.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 11:50:55 GMT
Alright, but here Björn seems to be taking what I would call an ordinary E-chord?
and it might have been tuned up, of course, here and at the original strumming
|
|
|
Post by shoshin on Nov 9, 2016 12:40:54 GMT
Alright, but here Björn seems to be taking what I would call an ordinary E-chord? Heh-heh, yes indeed. I'm glad you noticed this, because I almost included a long passage about it in my previous reply, having looked at some WIKTT videos last night. He is not only playing an E there rather than an E-flat, but he is playing (well, miming) through the whole song in the key of E, even though he is miming to a song that is blaring out in the key of E-flat. If you could hear his guitar, and if it was tuned correctly, the result would be horrendous on the ear. Of course, E and E-flat major aren't at all compatible with each other; they are as different to each other as E is to F. Again, without going into too much detail, this would support the point I made about the unlikely choice of E-flat when developing the song. In order (presumably) to avoid the awkwardness I mentioned when playing along to the song in its correct key, Bjorn has either tuned his guitar up a semitone, or he is having to make sure not to accidentally strum the strings, or his guitar is so quiet that he isn't worried about the sound he is making live in the studio. But the plot thickens. Check out another playback of the song (below) and he is miming along to it in another key completely. Not D, not E-flat, and not even E. You can tell this by the barre he is doing, which unfortunately makes it difficult to establish the key because I can't see the frets, but it is probably F-sharp. So I was going to put out a request for any other video examples of WIKTT in which you can see Bjorn playing the guitar, other than the two we are discussing and the live segment in the Movie. It maybe needs its own thread, because it would be very interesting to me but not, I suspect, to many others!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 13:15:04 GMT
but it is probably F-sharp. I think I've managed to convince myself he's starting off, on that video, doing the old F / B-flat thing. Does he muck around in this way with TV performances of other songs, or is it reserved for WIKTT?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2016 13:32:23 GMT
Alright, but here Björn seems to be taking what I would call an ordinary E-chord? Heh-heh, yes indeed. I'm glad you noticed this, because I almost included a long passage about it in my previous reply, having looked at some WIKTT videos last night. He is not only playing an E there rather than an E-flat, but he is playing (well, miming) through the whole song in the key of E, even though he is miming to a song that is blaring out in the key of E-flat. If you could hear his guitar, and if it was tuned correctly, the result would be horrendous on the ear. Of course, E and E-flat major aren't at all compatible with each other; they are as different to each other as E is to F. Thanks for your kind reply, Martin! I actually do know the difference between E and E-flat (even though I'm more 'guitarish' than guitarist ), but I'm going to blame my initial comment on loose reading, language barriers (its called 'Ess' in Swedish), world events and that old video we've both seen! But I agree, it is interesting. In my darkest moments, this discussion supports my theory that Björn might not have been a very big contributor after all...
|
|
|
Post by shoshin on Nov 9, 2016 15:11:27 GMT
Heh-heh, yes indeed. I'm glad you noticed this, because I almost included a long passage about it in my previous reply, having looked at some WIKTT videos last night. He is not only playing an E there rather than an E-flat, but he is playing (well, miming) through the whole song in the key of E, even though he is miming to a song that is blaring out in the key of E-flat. If you could hear his guitar, and if it was tuned correctly, the result would be horrendous on the ear. Of course, E and E-flat major aren't at all compatible with each other; they are as different to each other as E is to F. Thanks for your kind reply, Martin! I actually do know the difference between E and E-flat (even though I'm more 'guitarish' than guitarist ), but I'm going to blame my initial comment on loose reading, language barriers (its called 'Ess' in Swedish), world events and that old video we've both seen! But I agree, it is interesting. In my darkest moments, this discussion supports my theory that Björn might not have been a very big contributor after all... Yes, I didn't doubt that you would know the difference, especially as you spotted the chord that he was playing in the video But I thought that maybe it might seem to some that it was just a variation of E, so they would be thinking that I was making a mountain out of a molehill. I'm also sceptical about the musical side of the songwriting partnership being anything like an equal one. However, Bjorn's ability to play his instrument well has occasionally been questioned, whereas the video that I posted above tends to contradict this, albeit in a bizarre way. For reasons that I am really struggling to fathom, he is miming along in a random key that is causing him to have to move up and down the neck, silently using barre chords in a generally convincing way. I mean, if you are only having to mime, and you don't want to mime in the correct key for the song that you are miming along to, then why give yourself a difficult key to mime in? Yet Bjorn is even miming, in this new key, the little riff between the chords (everybody screamed.. diddle-dum..when I kissed the teacher.. diddle-dum). Now that's miming well beyond the call of duty
|
|