|
Post by richard on Jun 19, 2023 23:36:59 GMT
Johnny, I bet Bohemian Rhapsody would have fared no better, chartwise, than TDBYC, had it been released during Queen's declining popularity - regardless of its perceived merits now. (Musically, I far prefer TDBYC, by the way. Although, structurally, it's not really a blues, it has that kind of appeal for me - a kind of sparse, techno Scandinavian blues.)
At what stage a song appears in an artist's career, and its reception at that time, intrigues me. Take ABBA's SOS and MMM, as examples. I like both songs, but I doubt MMM would have got as high as 3 (UK chart) at any time other than the Arrival period, whereas I think SOS would have got higher than 6 at the time of Arrival and up to Super Trouper.
As it was, both big hits, of course. Not exactly failures.
|
|
|
Post by HOMETIME on Jun 20, 2023 9:24:32 GMT
Yes, I think timing is everything. It seems to be a matter of planetary alignment for some hits. If ABBA had somehow not released Dancing Queen until 1980 (but had still had all that success), I reckon there'd have been some mockery - these 30somethings singing about being a 17-year-old prowling for a "king" on the dancefloor. Mentions of jiving and tambourines might have had a harder time being excused though. I think a fair chunk of Dancing Queen's magic lies in its naive melancholy and I think more sophistication might have been required of ABBA by then. It's such a beautiful monster of melody, energy and production, though, that I can only imagine it'd still have been a big hit.
MMM is an interesting one. For some reason, it seems almost to have been written off as a single that had been buoyed by the success of Dancing Queen and the general surge in love for ABBA at the time. There are videos on YouTube plotting the chart trajectories of ABBA's singles in various territories. MMM seems to have had a much healthier chart career than that dismissive theory would lead you to believe. It didn't just hit No.3 in the UK and plummet: it bounced around the Top 5, hit the No.3 spot a number of times. It was No.1 in Australia, Germany, Belgium, NL, NZ and even the more reserved France, and actually stayed in the upper reaches of those charts for quite a while. The "advisors" in various territories that Polar relied on when choosing singles must have rated it highly too. Especially considering the stunner that is KMKY was still waiting in the wings.
|
|
|
Post by evilincarnate on Jun 20, 2023 14:52:00 GMT
"Money, Money, Money" was huge in Australia and probably still considered to be one of their best known singles here to this day, alongside "Waterloo", "Mamma Mia", "S.O.S.", "Fernando", "Dancing Queen" and "Knowing Me, Knowing You".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2023 15:35:01 GMT
I said timing was important as to a song's success. It may well be the most important factor but let's consider too the quality of the song.
For sure, Bohemian Rhapsody might not nave been #1 for 9 weeks if released later. But would it have fared as abysmally as ABBA's last 3 singles in the UK?
Australia has been mentioned. ABBA were of course huge for 18 months during mid 1975 to early 1977.
After that there was a backlash. Songs that were #1 hits in Europe, Knowing Me, Knowing You, Take a Chance On Me, The Winner Takes it all failed to make Aussie Top 5 or even Top 10 in case of TACOM. Why? Because ABBA were seen as past it Down Under. But they did do quite well, peaking at #9,#12 and #7. The quality of the songs helped prevent a collapse. During this same era Voulez Vous, I Have a Dream, Super Trouper were all massive flops. And let's be honest, those songs not as good as the others I mentioned.
Yeah, timing may well be the most important factor. But a really good song could reduce the collapse. Or look at it from another angle. An act is at the height of their success has one song under petforms in the chart. Look at SNC. This was not from an album. It did less well than expected. But the next single Chiquita was bigger in the UK and elsewhere. It seems ABBA fans still liked ABBA but not that song.
At peaks, artists can have "flops". During lean times, when they are no longer popular they can have hits. Just like some acts from the past may on occassion have a mini-revival - if they have a good enough song.
By 1982 ABBA's time was up. But better songs as singles *might* have lessened the catastrophic fall from grace.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jun 20, 2023 17:17:47 GMT
I had no idea MMM was such a chart success all over the place! Put my ignorance down to my parochial, UK-centric, short-sightedness. I had to give the song a listen on YouTube, as I hadn't heard it in a while. So good! I appreciate that, stylistically, the 'musical theatre' side of ABBA's pop is not to everyone's taste, but I love the song and Frida's sassy vocals; and I think she presents her lead so compellingly in the official video.
Just thought I'd mention that.
I think Johnny makes an interesting point about the quality of song maybe ameliorating what would otherwise be an abysmal chart position of a fading artist.
But regarding Super Trouper as an example of a 'lesser-quality' ABBA hit song: Nowadays I do think the 'four-square' chorus is not one of their best, and so I'm less enamoured of it than I used to be. But I find tha acapella intro, the verse-melody, the bridge, Frida's lead singing, and the backing vocals, are all great! So I can't really explain the vastly different reception the song got from the record-buying public in, for example, the the UK and Australia, respectively.
So, since 'quality of song' - especially one that has been received very differently in different regions of the world - is such a difficult thing to pin down, I won't even try! But I'm sure many have thought from time to time, of a hit song they didn't like, something along the lines of "No way! How is that a hit?" Or, alternatively, of a song they liked: "That deserved to be a big hit!"
And that's leaving aside the complications of an artist's popularity, or fading popularity!
|
|
|
Post by Sindy on Jun 20, 2023 18:22:15 GMT
Money x3 was a hit in the UK - #3 and certified gold.
|
|
|
Post by BAAB on Jun 20, 2023 19:55:56 GMT
Since weeks, MMM is trending on YouTube and TikTok...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2023 20:48:42 GMT
Richard - I find it interesting how different ABBA singles fared in different countries.
As mentioned, Super Trouper was a flop in Australia and America but really big in Europe.
I Dox5 only got to #38 and is oftem referred to as a flop - but that was the UK. It was a big hit everywhere else. #1 Australia, Top 10 in most European countties. Top 15 in the US.
The Name of the Game - only ever made #1 in the UK and stayed there for 4 weeks
And ABBA's commercial peaked at various different times. 1975-76 in Australia. 1976-77 the UK. 1977-78 the US. For Japan and Latin America it was 1979. In Australia in 1976 when ABBA were at their peak the awful Rock Me got to #4. Timing can be lucky for the undeserving too. In 1982, the German fans were more pragmatic making The Day Before You Came a Top 5 but less impressed with HOH and UA. This is the perfect example of an act in decline helped by an acclaimed song. But I guess this works only if people have open minds and don't reject outright (or follow slavishly). The UK rejected all 3 - especially TDBYC, and Belgium and Netherlands had the 3 singles all big hits.
In these Streaming times (and more globalised), past glories don't matter. Fernando was ABBA's 2nd biggest hit globally, biggest in some countries but relatively less popular on Streaming. Meanwhile the Voulez Vous songd, GGG LAYLOM and SOS relatively more popular.
Tik Tok has helped Angeleyes and as said MMM. The Mamma Mia films raised the profile of Slipping Through My Fingers and Honey Honey.
There seems to be less difference between countries though as to the most popular songs - Dancing Queen, GGG, Mamma Mia, The Winner Takes it All, Waterloo.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jun 21, 2023 9:13:15 GMT
Very interesting, Johnny, about about the different timelines of ABBA's popularity in various parts of the world - and fascinatingly and frustratingly complex to get to grips with!, I must admit Rock Me getting to No.4 in Australia is a big surprise to me. But it's another example of an opinion I've long held: that when an artist is in the 'hot zone' of popularity they could toss a coin to decide on their next hit single! Is that being cynical or actually touching on the reality of fickle success? [...] There seems to be less difference between countries though as to the most popular songs - Dancing Queen, GGG, Mamma Mia, The Winner Takes it All, Waterloo. But what about KMKY? Has it become less regarded? Because I'm sure many ABBA fans would say it's probably ABBA's greatest achievement. Certainly right up there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2023 10:26:27 GMT
Knowing Me Knowing You is in my Top 3 favourite ABBA songs. I think it's brilliant. In terms of popularity it was in ABBA's Top 3 in the UK but rather less popular elsewhere. I would imagine globally inside their Top 10 but outside the ABBA Top 5. Here is a list of the most popular songs on Spotify. As you can see KMKY is way down at 16th place. On the daily chart it is 17th. I accept there are ABBA fans who don't stream and listen to their CDs but no reason to think KMKY would be listened way more by this method. So, yes, relatively less popular. Look at the popularity of LAYLOM snd both Angeleyes and MMMM. The latter two clearly helped by Tik Tok. This is an interesting site as it shows the Streaming Popilarity of ALL ABBA songs. DQ is a shade under 1 billion and almost 1 in 6 of all ABBA streams kworb.net/spotify/artist/0LcJLqbBmaGUft1e9Mm8HV_songs.html
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jun 21, 2023 11:33:16 GMT
Thanks for that information, Johnny. And there I was assuming that Knowing Me Knowing You must be globally in the top 3 or 5 of ABBA songs!
I think KMKY is ABBA's most sophisticated single from the Arrival period, but, in retrospect, doesn't appear to have the immediate appeal of other ABBA hits such as DQ and TWTIA - nowadays probably generally regarded as their two most iconic songs.
|
|
|
Post by BAAB on Jun 21, 2023 14:58:18 GMT
KMKY surely is one of ABBAs most iconic songs, but also was one of their most iconic videos. Who didn't fell in love with Frida in her fur coat and with both Ladies stomping away in the snow. The visual in the Voyage Show ist also very beautiful.
What is trending on TikTok and what is not is hard to predict and sometimes very hard to understand as an ABBA Fan...Like the trending of Angeleyes in this awfull Highspeed Version. It is not that KMKY doesn't stand the test of time, it just wasn't re-invented yet by the TikTok Generation.
Getting back to the quality of the songs, I don't think that the quality lacked for HOH, TDBYC and UA, all three songs had something unexpected, new and partly also inventive in regards to production to offer. But the Pop listeners or the general ABBA fan at the time simply expected something else? And for the Fans it was maybe not easy to follow Björn and Benny on their theatrical trip. Everything led away from ABBA, not lacking quality but all Four lacking commitment to the project once called ABBA-The greatest POP group. And so many new Artists new better how to spell the word POP.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2023 10:44:35 GMT
⬆️ 💯%
HOH and UA were more pop but just not up to ABBA's high standards. Other acts during 1982, especially Buck Fizz and Tight Fit with their Fantasy Island were "more ABBA than ABBA" in 1982. And of course younger, which may have been a factor. I once read a review that Under Attack was Bucks Fizz meets Joy Division. So true! Lol.
TDBYC was theatrical and not commercial - just like ILTMS. Plus a few others from The Visitors I would add.
Also like ISHFIY, which was a single but the public preferred the more "typically ABBA" DSMD - despite ISHFIY being pushed as the "first new song" with video and vinyl single thrown in.
I think When You Danced with Me could have been a bigger hit than JAN was though both had uptempo feel. JAN was never single material imo.But released just 2 weeks before Voyage not a very big hit.
|
|
|
Post by richard on Jun 22, 2023 14:47:28 GMT
In trying to understand the decline of ABBA in '82, the simplest and most obvious explanation for me is that the record-buying public had lost interest - no matter what song they released at the time. KMKY has been mentioned recently - and I do regard it as one of ABBA''s greatest achievements - yet I can easily imagine it being a massive flop had it come out in '82. In those circumstances would the song now be regarded as 'too theatrical' I wonder.
So I'm not sure terms such as 'uncommercial' and 'theatrical' help much.
Trying to hear the '82 songs on their own terms - and leaving aside for the moment the 'ABBA had had their time' argument - apart from YOMO (which I do find a glib throwaway), I regard HOH and Cassandra as 'stylistically uncontemporary' - a term I prefer - but I don't think that about TDBYC or UA. I wouldn't describe TDBYC as theatrical - as I've stated elsewhere, for me it's more like a sparse, techno, Scandinavian blues, without actually having the structure of a blues, so maybe from that angle not liked much at the time; and I think that, along with one or two others, UA is under-powered.
|
|
|
Post by bennybjorn on Jun 22, 2023 22:45:53 GMT
If I had to use one word to describe the 1982 songs it would be 'slight'. But I like most of them lots. I think it's partly because I never really heard them at the time. I only knew the big Abba songs - it wasn't until the 1990s that I became more familiar with these ones (and others). So they always seem like relatively fresh and new songs to me. The Day Before is a gem but it clearly lacks the kind of huge euphoric chorus that characterises Abba's most successful singles. Love Under Attack, too, (and its cracking synthesiser solo) but it does feel a little thin.
|
|
|
Post by Alan on Jun 23, 2023 7:28:12 GMT
The one thing I will say in favour about the 1982 songs is that their lack of an album home didn’t help. Although The Singles was mine, meaning I could play it whenever I wanted (and I did - loads!) there was a sense of it being familiar songs from the 70s and early 80s and then these two new ones right at the end. Plus the two b-sides were tucked away on singles.
I still listen to albums from start to finish, the way that I did on vinyl originally. I see them as art and that’s how they were designed to be heard. However, bonus tracks added to the end don’t really work. I’m kind of done once the album proper finishes, but then there’s more.
I quite like the bonus disc that came with The Albums CD box in 2008, as that had most of the non-album tracks (apart from those released in the 1990s). Tracks are in chronological order, though I’m still not sure what’s the best way of hearing them.
Hence why I’m so glad they did the Voyage album and didn’t have two orphan tracks.
(I know these days you can make up your own albums - and I do - but even that doesn’t seem satisfactory for the non-album tracks).
|
|
|
Post by HOMETIME on Jun 23, 2023 21:15:45 GMT
The bonus tracks on Voulez-Vous almost make the set feel like a Greatest Hits package. None of the bonus tracks lowers the energy and even the non-album B-side could have made a case for reclassification as a single. Lovelight is a great track and I won't hear a word against it!
Apart from YOMO, the bonus tracks work well on The Visitors. I'm pleased to see that I'm not the only person to have made a new running order where TDBYC and SILOC replace HOH and TFTPOO. It makes for a beautifully moody listening experience.
|
|
|
Post by Alan on Jun 23, 2023 22:13:32 GMT
Stop it now! 😂
It’s just sacrilege!!! You’re not listening to The Visitors, but rather your idea of how you think The Visitors should be! For starters, The Day Before You Came could never have been part of that album!!
Your posts have made me want to start a pointless campaign to abolish downloading and streaming! In fact, bring back vinyl and cassette as the only ways of listening to albums, see how you substitute tracks then!!
I wouldn’t even remove I Have A Dream on Voulez-Vous and replace it with Summer Night City.
Blimey, is nothing sacred, not even the tracklisting and running orders of studio albums that are more than 40 years old? Off with your heads! 😂
|
|
|
Post by Michal on Jun 24, 2023 5:32:25 GMT
My sentiments exactly! Alan, let's start s crusade together against these disbelievers, brother in arms!
|
|
|
Post by evilincarnate on Jun 24, 2023 5:35:34 GMT
Thanks for that information, Johnny. And there I was assuming that Knowing Me Knowing You must be globally in the top 3 or 5 of ABBA songs! I think KMKY is ABBA's most sophisticated single from the Arrival period, but, in retrospect, doesn't appear to have the immediate appeal of other ABBA hits such as DQ and TWTIA - nowadays probably generally regarded as their two most iconic songs. I agree that "Knowing Me, Knowing You" was their most sophisticated single at the time of its release, but also believe it remains pretty close to perfect after all these years. (I actually think it's just as catchy/immediate as "Dancing Queen" so find it surprising it wasn't a global number one.) Other contenders for notably complex/polished singles would be "The Name Of The Game", "Take A Chance On Me", "The Winner Takes It All" and "The Day Before You Came". Oh, and of course, "Rock Me"!
|
|
|
Post by evilincarnate on Jun 24, 2023 5:45:11 GMT
Stop it now! 😂 It’s just sacrilege!!! You’re not listening to The Visitors, but rather your idea of how you think The Visitors should be! For starters, The Day Before You Came could never have been part of that album!! Your posts have made me want to start a pointless campaign to abolish downloading and streaming! In fact, bring back vinyl and cassette as the only ways of listening to albums, see how you substitute tracks then!! I wouldn’t even remove I Have A Dream on Voulez-Vous and replace it with Summer Night City. Blimey, is nothing sacred, not even the tracklisting and running orders of studio albums that are more than 40 years old? Off with your heads! 😂
|
|
|
Post by Michel on Jun 24, 2023 6:33:36 GMT
I'm with Alan on this.
I also prefer to listen to shorter albums of about 40 minutes, especially when it comes to studio albums. Since the CD era some artists have released studio albums with a running time of 60 or 70 plus minutes. Too long for my liking. I sometimes find myself becoming impatient for them to end. I feel most of these albums would work better with a bit of editing. It's better to leave the listener wanting more.
The Deluxe Edition that has the best choice of bonus material for me is "Voules-Vous".
|
|
|
Post by Michal on Jun 24, 2023 11:12:44 GMT
It's not about bonus tracks but rather about the way we listen to studio albums. I tend to listen to them from start to finish, no skipping, no interruptions. I actually love bonus tracks - the more there are, the better, but ideally I would place them on a separate disc. If they must be on the same disc, I like it when they're separated from the last track of the album by a longer pause (it was handled this way on the Marie Fredriksson's reissues - there are 20 or 30 seconds pauses between the closing tracks of the albums and the first bonus tracks). So you don't have to be ready with your trembling finger on the stop button, if you don't want to hear them.
|
|
|
Post by lamont on Jun 24, 2023 11:16:18 GMT
I ‘unfortunately’ have butchered The Visitors too! SILOC is after TFTPOO, I’ve but Elaine after Me and I, and POYWS after The Piper, I open VV with long version of SNC, and make up a mystical Opus 10 album with 82 tracks, With IKTSGO, Man and Slowly beefing it up, with Skallgang ending album as it’s part of ABBA canon now.
|
|
|
Post by Alan on Jun 24, 2023 14:33:07 GMT
It's not about bonus tracks but rather about the way we listen to studio albums. I tend to listen to them from start to finish, no skipping, no interruptions. I actually love bonus tracks - the more there are, the better, but ideally I would place them on a separate disc. Thank you! I’m not the only one on here! 😀 I have contemplated separating the bonus tracks onto a separate “disc” in my iTunes, meaning each studio album would have one. That might be a better way of hearing them. In the days of vinyl and cassette, you’d even have that enforced break after Side 1. You could then decide to listen to Side 2 another time. In the 80s I used to get cassettes, and often one side of playing time would be longer than the other. I had an unfounded belief that fast-forwarding the empty tape at the end would eventually damage the cassette, so I’d sit through it. If it was Side 1 that was shorter, this meant an even longer break between sides than merely turning the record over! At upto 80 minutes, CDs did get rather long. With the record industry re-focus on vinyl, they’ve got shorter again. In the 1990s, ABBA would have been expected to come up with a longer album than Voyage. By chance they waited until album lengths were much more similar to what they were in the 70s and 80s.
|
|
|
Post by Michel on Jun 24, 2023 16:49:10 GMT
So you don't have to be ready with your trembling finger on the stop button, if you don't want to hear them. Lol! Yes, I would prefer bonus tracks on a separate disc as well so that the original album remains intact. Look at the excellent reissues of Tina Turner's albums "Break Every Rule" and "Foreign Affair". They're housed in a box. CD1 is the original album, CD2 the disc with bonus tracks (B-sides, remixes and live tracks). Then there are further discs with a complete concert from the era on CD and DVD. The music videos from the albums are also included and on "Break Every Rule" a full TV special from the era on DVD. The Spanish tracks from "Gracias Por La Musica" scattered over the separate studio albums was an especially misguided decision as far as I'm concerned. The Spanish album was a separate, stand-alone project, so to me these tracks don't have any connection with the original albums. In some cases the backing track was remixed and the vocals recorded years after the original album. They probably were desperate to find any kind of bonus tracks. Then when all the original albums were released as a deluxe, "Gracias Por La Musica" got its own deluxe treatment after all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2023 19:14:11 GMT
The bonus tracks on Voulez-Vous almost make the set feel like a Greatest Hits package. None of the bonus tracks lowers the energy and even the non-album B-side could have made a case for reclassification as a single. Lovelight is a great track and I won't hear a word against it! Apart from YOMO, the bonus tracks work well on The Visitors. I'm pleased to see that I'm not the only person to have made a new running order where TDBYC and SILOC replace HOH and TFTPOO. It makes for a beautifully moody listening experience. I agree. The bonus tracks work best on Voulez Vous and The Visitors. ABBA had tracks to spare in 1979 - SNC, Lovelight and JAN. With Voyage they seemed to be struggling to fill and album and so had to fall back on JAN. I have the 2001 version of The Visitors and that doesn't include.YOMO - which reminds me more of a Ring Ring track. So out of place as a bonus track on The Visitors. The 2012 deluxe edition has too many bonus tracks and several just don't fit in. Michel - agree with not having the Spanish songs as bonus tracks.
|
|
|
Post by HOMETIME on Jun 24, 2023 19:48:15 GMT
Totally agree with Michel - bonus tracks work better on a separate disc. It means that a (hopefully beautifully) remastered album is presented without compromise. Extra tracks provide context for how the final set was developed and agreed upon. B-sides, remixes, outtakes, alternate versions are fantastic treats - especially for diehard fans - and they deserve to be held aside for their own worth. Johnny has me thinking about how JAN might have sounded/worked had it been completed in ABBA's original heyday. The boogie beat that we now have would have been too retro, too out of kilter with the Voulez-Vous album. Now that they had no trends to consider, I can see how they probably felt freed to present it as they finally did. I'd have loved to have had newly recorded vocals and a natural ending, though. I know we've gone over this ad nauseaum, so I'm not looking to restart a tired discussion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2023 5:39:08 GMT
DYMK had a contemporary feel - for 1979. JAN sounds very retro, by that I mean more early 60s than late 70s.
|
|