|
|
Post by agness on Sept 24, 2015 18:55:32 GMT
And there is another thing: practically all the pages from this magazine are printed on a dim paper (I hope the word "dim" is correctly employed here), so this effect can be caused by this fact, can it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 24, 2015 18:58:00 GMT
And there is another thing: practically all the pages from this magazine are printed on a dim paper (I hope the word "dim" is correctly employed here), so this effect can be caused by this fact, can it? Maybe, but it seems to me more like digital artifacts. |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 24, 2015 19:21:58 GMT
Maybe, but it seems to me more like digital artifacts. I scanned a part of this picture again now, just out of curiosity  Unfortunately, this is a quality of paper....  Here is high-quality jpeg scan of one part (without changing) My changes of colour and clarity made the defect of paper more visible...  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 24, 2015 19:25:40 GMT
Maybe, but it seems to me more like digital artifacts. I scanned a part of this picture again now, just out of curiosity Unfortunately, this is a quality of paper.... Here is high-quality jpeg scan of one part (without changing) My changes of colour and clarity made the defect of paper more visible... I think this one looks much better  |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 24, 2015 19:48:08 GMT
I think this one looks much better Maybe a little bit... Look at this screenshot from the program, you can see the defects  I have another one rare shot from this magazine (from site sjobergbild) but on a glossy paper (like my calendar image posted before). I will post it and we will see the real differences  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 24, 2015 19:52:56 GMT
I think this one looks much better Maybe a little bit... Look at this screenshot from the program, you can see the defects I have another one rare shot from this magazine (from site sjobergbild) but on a glossy paper (like my calendar image posted before). I will post it and we will see the real differences Here's a comparison with your older scan. I hope you'll be able to see what I meant.  |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 24, 2015 20:03:23 GMT
Here's a comparison with your older scan. I hope you'll be able to see what I meant. I see the imperfections of paper, I don't know how to call this effect of paper that the publishers made during the process of printing, but there is some mix of dulling and gloss here. The only difference is that I applied some light and colour effects and made these imperfections more remarkable... Let's wait for a glossy scan to compare them |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 25, 2015 14:19:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 16:30:56 GMT
Let's wait for a glossy scan to compare them Sorry for the waiting, I was busy the last day. Here is the scan from the same german magazine that I promised (on a glossy paper)  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 16:34:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 16:53:00 GMT
You're welcome!!! Oh, somebody scanned from "The ABBA photobook", excellent!  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 16:57:15 GMT
You're welcome!!! Oh, somebody scanned from "The ABBA photobook", excellent! I don't believe it's a scan from the photobook, I found it on some news/magazine website where I believe they published copies from the digital files that have been used for the book (and scanned directly from the original films). |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 17:22:04 GMT
I don't believe it's a scan from the photobook, I found it on some news/magazine website where I believe they published copies from the digital files that have been used for the book (and scanned directly from the original films). Yes, it looks like an original digital file that was published in that book, because if that was a scan, there could be a visible line of centerfold (a mean non-photoshoped scan), because this book is very volume |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 17:24:15 GMT
I don't believe it's a scan from the photobook, I found it on some news/magazine website where I believe they published copies from the digital files that have been used for the book (and scanned directly from the original films). Yes, it looks like an original digital file that was published in that book, because if that was a scan, there could be a visible line of centerfold (a mean non-photoshoped scan), because this book is very volume Not to mention the text on the right... |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 17:30:27 GMT
Not to mention the text on the right... Do you mean my scan? This is from german magazine (not from this official ABBA photobook) and they wrote some comments on every photo... |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 17:37:49 GMT
Not to mention the text on the right... Do you mean my scan? This is from german magazine (not from this official ABBA photobook) and they wrote some comments on every photo... Right... I forgot  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 17:54:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 17:58:39 GMT
Do you mean my scan? This is from german magazine (not from this official ABBA photobook) and they wrote some comments on every photo... Right... I forgot No problem  ) Photo of Agnetha and Bjorn making some buyings for Linda (Linda was approximately 6 weeks at that time)  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 18:02:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 18:20:39 GMT
Agnetha and Bjorn at Grand Hotel after ABBA's winning at Eurovision (Agnetha was ill here)  |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 20:03:17 GMT
Yes, I have already seen. I discovered this site sjobergbild.se more than 4 years ago (at that time the watermark was another and smaller) and I saved these photos on my pc. |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 20:05:04 GMT
Yes, I have already seen. I discovered this site sjobergbild.se more than 4 years ago (at that time the watermark were another and smaller) and I saved these photos on my pc. Cool, could you post a sample? |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 20:19:51 GMT
Yes, I have already seen. I discovered this site sjobergbild.se more than 4 years ago (at that time the watermark were another and smaller) and I saved these photos on my pc. Cool, could you post a sample? Of course))) For exemple:  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 20:27:26 GMT
Thanks! Do you have this one?  |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 20:47:04 GMT
Thanks! Do you have this one? Yes, I do!  |
|
|
|
Post by Fafner on Sept 26, 2015 20:50:09 GMT
^^ Cool, thanks again. Pity that the watermark is still all over her mouth  |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 26, 2015 21:28:28 GMT
^^ Cool, thanks again. Pity that the watermark is still all over her mouth Yes, very pity  You're always welcome! Agnetha and Bjorn in Switzerland  |
|
|
|
Post by mwilson on Sept 26, 2015 22:59:44 GMT
Agnetha and Bjorn at Grand Hotel after ABBA's winning at Eurovision (Agnetha was ill here) Wow. At what point do the photographers have to get out? |
|
|
|
Post by agness on Sept 27, 2015 10:43:44 GMT
Agnetha and Bjorn at Grand Hotel after ABBA's winning at Eurovision (Agnetha was ill here) Wow. At what point do the photographers have to get out? It only remains to suspect here I remembered another one from Eurovision time. Agnetha stayed in hospital and Bjorn looked after her.  |
|
|
|
Post by shoshin on Sept 27, 2015 16:08:18 GMT
^^ Cool, thanks again. Pity that the watermark is still all over her mouth Yes, very pity You're always welcome! Agnetha and Bjorn in Switzerland One of my many unsuccessful threads, ABBAchronisms, mentions this image and the related video footage. ABBA anachronisms are events that seem to occur in the wrong order. When documentary makers or fans want to show how the marriage went downhill, they sometimes use the Leysin skating images to represent A & B in happier times, as if this was before the problems started. abbachat.com/thread/531/abbachronisms |
|
Unfortunately, this is a quality of paper.... 
Here is high-quality jpeg scan of one part (without changing)
)
You're always welcome!
