|
Post by waterloose1 on Nov 25, 2017 17:58:13 GMT
I know some of you are aware of the dispute over the proposed location for Mamma Mia The Party in Waterloo London. I am one of the local residents. I wanted to come and say hello and outline the reasons why we are opposing the proposal. First, I want to make clear that I am personally a great Abba fan. I am of an age where Abba were the sound track to my childhood. The sound of family parties. And, unlike pretty much everything else played at our family parties back then, Abba music stands the test of time. Our campaign has nothing to do with not liking Abba. Our campaign is to protect our sleep, and to protect land that should be used for social housing. This is just not the right site for Mamma Mia The Party. The proposed site is in a dense residential neighbourhood. There are housing co-ops on three sides, a college on the forth. There are council tenants, housing association tenants, homeowners, renters, student digs, a 24 hour library and a hostel all in the immediate area. We live in flats. Our bedrooms face right on the street. The disturbance from 530 revellers, eight times a week, would drive anyone to their wits end. Not even a diehard fan could put up with drunk renditions of Dancing Queen, as people head home, every night. The additional congestion and pollution. I won't go on. More info from the links below. I'm more than happy to discuss this if anyone wants. More info: waterloose1.wordpress.com/Watch our film, including Abba like you've maybe not heard! Abba - the nightmare: waterloose1.wordpress.com/abba-the-nightmare/Guardian article: www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/nov/06/abba-mamma-mia-party-restaurant-waterloo-londonThanks for your time Phil
|
|
|
Post by Zeebee on Nov 25, 2017 20:38:55 GMT
I presume they would have to apply for a permit to have the event at that location. If the event would be such a disturbance to the local residents, surely they will be denied a permit.
|
|
|
Post by waterloose1 on Nov 25, 2017 21:06:44 GMT
I presume they would have to apply for a permit to have the event at that location. If the event would be such a disturbance to the local residents, surely they will be denied a permit. Hello Zeebee Yes, the site is empty so a temporary venue needs building. The local council, Lambeth, have to grant planning permission. The Lambeth Planning Application committee members all saw that it is nigh on impossible for the applicant to mitigate anti-social behaviour and asked they return with an improved visitor management plan. Basically, this process is underway. The application also needs an alcohol license but this has not been applied for yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2017 1:42:07 GMT
Hello Phil,
Speaking as an ABBA fan, I think the original MM Party venue here in Stockholm should have been stopped a long time ago for several reasons, not least because I care about their legacy!
But having read the British press, and not being too familiar with your part of London, there seems to be more going on than concerns about late night nuisance? After all, they claim to make the building soundproof, and how rumbustious can middle-aged ABBA fans be after 10:30, anyway? Isn't it more to do with finding better uses for the lot?
Cheers, Jens
|
|
|
Post by waterloose1 on Nov 26, 2017 13:11:07 GMT
Hello Phil, Speaking as an ABBA fan, I think the original MM Party venue here in Stockholm should have been stopped a long time ago for several reasons, not least because I care about their legacy! But having read the British press, and not being too familiar with your part of London, there seems to be more going on than concerns about late night nuisance? After all, they claim to make the building soundproof, and how rumbustious can middle-aged ABBA fans be after 10:30, anyway? Isn't it more to do with finding better uses for the lot? Cheers, Jens Hello Jens Yes, you are correct. There is both concern about the disturbance that this specific proposal would cause and there is a long term dispute about land use in Waterloo. Please try to understand the potential for disturbance. The proposal includes a dance floor, live music, recorded music. Customers are encouraged to drink, sing and dance. It is a lively, party night out marketed to groups. People, families, live right next door, right opposite. Our bedrooms are 5 meters from the venue. Our homes are in every direction to transport and the South Bank cultural quarter. This is mostly social housing. We live in flats. Our bedrooms face right on the street. Cars, taxis and coaches will drop off and pick up right outside bedroom windows. We will have dozens of pedicabs jostling for business blasting Abba from their mobile sound systems. All right on our doorsteps. Look at the image on our web site hereThere is also the dispute over land. Briefly, in the 1970s the community here won a huge campaign which saw a large piece of land handed over to the community. Mostly for housing but also other community ameneties such as community centre and small business units. A body was created to take ownership of the land on behalf of the community. This was called Coin Street Community Builders (CSCB). Unfortunately CSCB are an unaccountable private company who have over the years grown ever distant from the community they claim to represent. After 33 years CSCB have yet to build the houses they are obliged to according to their founding agreements. Much of the land remains undeveloped. CSCB have give some land for free to a big private company, Ballet Rambert. Yet they claim they need the money from this proposal. CSCB has a huge revenue stream and incredible assets. They were sold this amazing piece of land at a very cheap price on the understanding they would develop it for the community. It is shocking they cannot manage these assets well enough to build homes. If the proposed Mamma Mia site is lost to a commercial development CSCB do not seem to have the land left to meet their home building obligations. More info here or ask me if you prefer.
|
|
|
Post by erikoslo on Nov 26, 2017 18:01:56 GMT
I´ve read somehwhere that they got to rent the land for five years, due to no emminent buildingplans are in place. After five years the Mamma Mia building will be taken down again. Is that right?
|
|
|
Post by josef on Nov 27, 2017 16:33:33 GMT
I'm 100% behind you. I love ABBA's music but this will damage their legacy if it goes ahead. You CAN have too much of a good thing.
For what it's worth, I find the Mamma Mia the Party thing a terrible idea in the first place. I haven't read too much about it but it's most likely hugely expensive and out of reach of most people's pockets. I'd bet money on it lol
Anyway, I wish you every success. This should not go ahead! Wake up Björn Ulvaeus! You're rich beyond your wildest dreams, this won't affect you, but most people aren't and have to get up every day and go to their tiring, ordinary jobs. They NEED their sleep!
|
|
|
Post by Liebezeit on Nov 28, 2017 0:06:14 GMT
I'm American and I'm not overall concerned about "stopping Mamma Mia the Party" but the only thing that ticked me off and at first confused me is that:
Who would even dare to build some loud business near a study neighbourhood?
There's a library just adjacent to it, for Lyngstad's sake.
I don't want to discourage anyone, whether associated with ABBA or just a fan of the group who wants to carry on ABBA's legacy, I'll be honest. And I won't. Laissez-faire, precisely. If Björn Ulvaeus wants to do his restaurant business ventures based on ABBA, he has more options to do it as well at another location, assuming he has amassed amount of money from songwriting revenues; such as the United States of America, Canada, or Australia, or find another region in the UK (Ireland, Scotland). More blank land, more opportunities, whether it may be dense or isolated. But I know it's rather more complicated than it may be.. not all housings or real estates will oblige for a nightclub, and/or it may already be regulated by whoever wishes that what should be there and not.
According to a few articles and the website itself, the business includes serving Greek food to their customers. It's only a nightclub with Mediterranean-Greek cuisine, which is all cool, I guess, but Ulvaeus ought to be more considerate of the area itself regardless of where, what, and et cetera.
|
|
|
Post by erikoslo on Nov 28, 2017 11:37:43 GMT
I doubt that libraries and ABBA the Party are busy at the same time of the day!
|
|
|
Post by Liebezeit on Nov 28, 2017 13:15:41 GMT
I doubt that libraries and ABBA the Party are busy at the same time of the day! Particularly, the library near Mamma Mia The Party is open through 8:30 AM to 1:00 AM from the WRA's websites, but based on numerous information from online reviews, Mamma Mia the Party would operate just right between 6:30 PM and 11:00 PM (or midnight to 1 AM), based on the Stockholm version (London's business hours had not been announced yet) So the library might have some tinge of disturbance when there's a situation of some student trying to study at the last moment... at night. So the argument that blasting ABBA's music 24/7/365 and attracting intoxicated ABBA-singing people would drive anyone crazy (from the video ABBA: The Nightmare), is just pure hyperbolism... The library will be busy for the rest of the day until 0100, but the party will sleep until the eve calls onto them and then they'll go back to their normal lives by the same time the library closes if I'm not mistaken
|
|
|
Post by josef on Nov 28, 2017 16:22:59 GMT
The trouble with some rich people is they become divorced from the everyday reality of life for most people. They live in such luxury that they forget about the concerns of ordinary people. Even Frida is guilty of it. She made some comment, I forget the details now, damn it, but it proved that she had lost touch. It wasn't meant in a mean way, it was just thoughtless. We don't all have apartments here and there and homes by the sea. I hope Bjorn does some research and comes to his senses.
|
|
|
Post by erikoslo on Nov 28, 2017 19:19:39 GMT
Oh... please, Josef! This is not Bjorns problem. It´s not that Bjorn has stolen a piece of land. This is clearly a piece of land that has been available to them. If anything it´s a political issue so please blame them instead.
|
|
|
Post by waterloose1 on Nov 28, 2017 22:16:23 GMT
I´ve read somehwhere that they got to rent the land for five years, due to no emminent buildingplans are in place. After five years the Mamma Mia building will be taken down again. Is that right? Hello erikoslo Yes it is true that the application is for 5 years. However, the application was originally for 10 years. Once in place it will be in a good position to apply for an extension.
|
|
|
Post by waterloose1 on Nov 28, 2017 22:18:45 GMT
I doubt that libraries and ABBA the Party are busy at the same time of the day! Hello erikoslo Oh yes they are! The Kings College library is open and busy up until 1am. It is used by student doctors and nurses.
|
|
|
Post by shoshin on Nov 29, 2017 0:36:00 GMT
Of all the possible locations in all of the world's great cities, what are the chances that the most suitable site happens to be Waterloo? The next one will no doubt be in Happy Hawaii. Björn will promote it by working Honolulu into Mamma Mia! 3. Tropical Loveland on a bouzouki; I can't wait.
I agree with Josef. It took the thick end of two decades for the quality of ABBA's music to be reassessed as something more than pop confectionery. Björn's commercial interventions are undermining a hard-won legacy that is based, to be honest, on Benny's compositional genius and the girls' world class vocals.
|
|
|
Post by foreverfan on Nov 29, 2017 9:04:23 GMT
One could argue that this is business, as that's what ABBA now is, a business machine. Imagine if you were the owner of ABBA, then commercially ' Waterloo' is the perfect location. I don't know all the rules and regulations, but no doubt there are many, and noise/ disturbance/volume of people etc, would be carefully considered with any local council, and if need be the local population consulted. As they say you can't please all the people all of the time. It's always never in my back yard. Thats from a logical point of view.
For balance, I'd need to know more, but guess I wouldn't like it right next door to me.
|
|
|
Post by shoshin on Nov 29, 2017 10:50:56 GMT
One could argue that this is business, as that's what ABBA now is, a business machine. Imagine if you were the owner of ABBA, then commercially 'Waterloo' is the perfect location.. This isn't really an ABBA project though; Benny made that clear when he was interviewed at the opening of the Stockholm venue. It was very much Björn's baby and Benny didn't look too pleased about it. Waterloo makes sense as the perfect location, in the same way that the perfect culinary experience will be assured by restricting the choice of Head Chef to applicants named Fernando. I'm afraid that this is the cheesy way that Björn is framing ABBA's future, whereas Benny knows that they could just let the music speak.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 12:54:10 GMT
The whole thing sounds pretty diabolical to me. Maybe they should just rename it 'Money Money Money - the Party' and be done with it. From an ABBA perspective, it irks me that the legacy is once more to be shone through the prism of 'Mamma Mia'. It's almost as if ABBA themselves need to be marginalised to maximise the 'commercial potential' of their work. Does anyone remember when music was, first and foremost, art - and not just a business?
I'm sure it'll be Glasgow next. That's mentioned in 'Super Trouper', after all.
|
|
|
Post by josef on Nov 29, 2017 15:15:01 GMT
Oh... please, Josef! This is not Bjorns problem. It´s not that Bjorn has stolen a piece of land. This is clearly a piece of land that has been available to them. If anything it´s a political issue so please blame them instead. What on earth are you going on about?! I never said Björn had stolen a piece of land. I stand by what I said. He needs a wake-up call.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 16:37:47 GMT
It can hardly be money that motivates Björn - he's more likely got too much spare time on his hands, which has been obvious over the last years. As of late, he's been dabbling in Swedish real estate, trying heroically to make it sound like a very creative pursuit in interviews. Also, as opposed to the other three, he seems genuinely pleased to comment on the group's heyday in all kinds of different settings. He probably feels this concept is a way of immortalizing the music some more, misguidedly so, in my opinion.
It's something that should have been questioned much more from the outset, but the clever PR coup of having all four appear on stage at the Stockholm opening was probably designed to deflect such objections.
|
|
|
Post by gary on Dec 2, 2017 23:19:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by josef on Dec 5, 2017 16:36:00 GMT
I don't know about calling it Mamma Mia! The Party, more like Mamma Mia! The Monster lol
In Björn's defense, it's endearing that he wants to keep ABBA's music alive and he's a lovely, intelligent man. Also, he's recently made some comments about the #MeToo campaign which shows he's pretty clued up. It reminded me of when Frida made those comments about him really being in touch with the female point of view during an interview they gave together a few years ago.
|
|
|
Post by gary on Dec 13, 2017 22:43:52 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2017 15:41:44 GMT
Depressing news reports on the telly and toilets with vomit stains? They must be aiming for Tate Modern!
|
|
|
Post by chelseacharger on May 12, 2018 15:51:15 GMT
Probably a wise move by Bjorn. Regardless of how much, or even if this venture damages ABBA's 'legacy', it certainly would have been unseemly to become embroiled in a prolonged battle with the residents leading to bad feeling even if successful. The search for an alternative site is on.
www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/bjorn-pulls-out-of-abba-themed-south-bank-theatre-restaurant-plan-after-campaign-by-residents/
Björn said: “Everything that Mamma Mia! has done – from its conception more than 20 years ago, to the new film being made right now – has been charged with positive energy. That’s why I am hugely excited to bring Mamma Mia! The Party to London and hope to do so in Spring 2019 as planned.
“However I have reached the conclusion that the party should not open on the South Bank near Waterloo. Despite being granted planning permission in November 2017, I’ve taken seriously the concerns expressed by some local residents living around Stamford Street and so have decided not to go ahead with our plans on this site.
“We have been looking at some equally exciting alternatives in London and expect to announce a new location shortly.”
|
|
|
Post by josef on May 17, 2018 21:11:25 GMT
Good old Bjornyboy, he saw sense. This is the right thing to do.
|
|